<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Affordable code-signing certificates, no chance!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.assarbad.net/20080907/affordable-code-signing-certificates-no-chance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.assarbad.net/20080907/affordable-code-signing-certificates-no-chance/</link>
	<description>cogito cogito, ergo cogito sum</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:33:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: carlos</title>
		<link>http://blog.assarbad.net/20080907/affordable-code-signing-certificates-no-chance/comment-page-1/#comment-46779</link>
		<dc:creator>carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.assarbad.net/20080907/affordable-code-signing-certificates-no-chance/#comment-46779</guid>
		<description>yes it&#039;s signed by CACE TECHNOLOGIES.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes it&#8217;s signed by CACE TECHNOLOGIES.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fowl</title>
		<link>http://blog.assarbad.net/20080907/affordable-code-signing-certificates-no-chance/comment-page-1/#comment-46691</link>
		<dc:creator>Fowl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.assarbad.net/20080907/affordable-code-signing-certificates-no-chance/#comment-46691</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t believe that they (daemon tools) are doing anything &quot;suspect&quot;, a virtual DVD drive is very useful. 

Unfortunately I just discovered that their actual kernel-mode code is provided by Duplex Secure Ltd. which I assume has a real cert - although this box is &quot;compromised&quot; as it were (has daemon tools installed) so I can&#039;t be certain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t believe that they (daemon tools) are doing anything &#8220;suspect&#8221;, a virtual DVD drive is very useful. </p>
<p>Unfortunately I just discovered that their actual kernel-mode code is provided by Duplex Secure Ltd. which I assume has a real cert &#8211; although this box is &#8220;compromised&#8221; as it were (has daemon tools installed) so I can&#8217;t be certain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver</title>
		<link>http://blog.assarbad.net/20080907/affordable-code-signing-certificates-no-chance/comment-page-1/#comment-46689</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.assarbad.net/20080907/affordable-code-signing-certificates-no-chance/#comment-46689</guid>
		<description>Phew, that&#039;s kind of ugly, don&#039;t you think? But yes, it&#039;s likely they do not get through WHQL at the very least, they are using quite some tricks in their driver ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phew, that&#8217;s kind of ugly, don&#8217;t you think? But yes, it&#8217;s likely they do not get through WHQL at the very least, they are using quite some tricks in their driver <img src='http://blog.assarbad.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fowl</title>
		<link>http://blog.assarbad.net/20080907/affordable-code-signing-certificates-no-chance/comment-page-1/#comment-46687</link>
		<dc:creator>Fowl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.assarbad.net/20080907/affordable-code-signing-certificates-no-chance/#comment-46687</guid>
		<description>I think daemon tools installs their root CA when you install it for the first time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think daemon tools installs their root CA when you install it for the first time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver</title>
		<link>http://blog.assarbad.net/20080907/affordable-code-signing-certificates-no-chance/comment-page-1/#comment-46686</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.assarbad.net/20080907/affordable-code-signing-certificates-no-chance/#comment-46686</guid>
		<description>Carlos: have you checked whether the driver is signed? I know it loads, but from experience as driver developer I know that Vista x64 does not allow unsigned code, at most test-signed but in this case you have to install the respective CA certificate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carlos: have you checked whether the driver is signed? I know it loads, but from experience as driver developer I know that Vista x64 does not allow unsigned code, at most test-signed but in this case you have to install the respective CA certificate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carlos</title>
		<link>http://blog.assarbad.net/20080907/affordable-code-signing-certificates-no-chance/comment-page-1/#comment-46682</link>
		<dc:creator>carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 04:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.assarbad.net/20080907/affordable-code-signing-certificates-no-chance/#comment-46682</guid>
		<description>Well WinPcap install fine in vista x64</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well WinPcap install fine in vista x64</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fowl</title>
		<link>http://blog.assarbad.net/20080907/affordable-code-signing-certificates-no-chance/comment-page-1/#comment-46642</link>
		<dc:creator>Fowl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.assarbad.net/20080907/affordable-code-signing-certificates-no-chance/#comment-46642</guid>
		<description>What Rick Brewster for Paint.Net did was create a LLC. He describes this on his blog: http://blog.getpaint.net/2007/08/08/paintnet-begets-dotpdn-llc/

Although he seemed to be able get a certificate as &quot;Rick Brewster&quot; before hand so perhaps you might want to contact him to find out how.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Rick Brewster for Paint.Net did was create a LLC. He describes this on his blog: <a href="http://blog.getpaint.net/2007/08/08/paintnet-begets-dotpdn-llc/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.getpaint.net/2007/08/08/paintnet-begets-dotpdn-llc/</a></p>
<p>Although he seemed to be able get a certificate as &#8220;Rick Brewster&#8221; before hand so perhaps you might want to contact him to find out how.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
