Comments on: NT Shell Scripts vs. Batch Scripts http://blog.assarbad.net/20070222/nt-shell-scripts-vs-batch-scripts/ Programming, reverse engineering and anything else as well ... Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:12:04 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: Oliver http://blog.assarbad.net/20070222/nt-shell-scripts-vs-batch-scripts/#comment-608 Oliver Fri, 23 Feb 2007 01:02:39 +0000 http://blog.assarbad.net/20070222/nt-shell-scripts-vs-batch-scripts/#comment-608 Not quite right. Simple test script: <pre>@echo off echo Bla pause</pre> Check the process started. On XP it is always CMD.EXE. AFAIK it was the same for Windows 2000. // Oliver Not quite right. Simple test script:

@echo off
echo Bla
pause

Check the process started. On XP it is always CMD.EXE. AFAIK it was the same for Windows 2000.

// Oliver

]]> By: Luckie http://blog.assarbad.net/20070222/nt-shell-scripts-vs-batch-scripts/#comment-599 Luckie Thu, 22 Feb 2007 23:36:59 +0000 http://blog.assarbad.net/20070222/nt-shell-scripts-vs-batch-scripts/#comment-599 As far as I know under NT *.cmd envokes the 32-Bit command shell where as *.bat invokes the 16-bit command shell. And you only got he advanced "batch" commands with the 32-bit command shell. As far as I know under NT *.cmd envokes the 32-Bit command shell where as *.bat invokes the 16-bit command shell. And you only got he advanced “batch” commands with the 32-bit command shell.

]]>