<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Agnitum panicked because of Microsoft&#8217;s security measures</title>
	<link>http://blog.assarbad.net/20060727/agnitum_panicked/</link>
	<description>Programming, reverse engineering and anything else as well ...</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 01:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Assa&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Agnitum still panicked?! &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.assarbad.net/20060727/agnitum_panicked/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Assa&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Agnitum still panicked?! &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 00:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.assarbad.net/20060727/agnitum_panicked/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>[...] Yes, there are thousands of companies relying on the kernel and many of them even relying only on the documented part, is it? Possibly you should change your policy and follow their example?! As I already wrote in my article you are already using &#8220;tools and tactics used by malicious hackers&#8221; as you put it. And this is the actual problem, not MS&#8217; efforts to close down access to the (largely undocumented) kernel. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Yes, there are thousands of companies relying on the kernel and many of them even relying only on the documented part, is it? Possibly you should change your policy and follow their example?! As I already wrote in my article you are already using &#8220;tools and tactics used by malicious hackers&#8221; as you put it. And this is the actual problem, not MS&#8217; efforts to close down access to the (largely undocumented) kernel. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Assa&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Export drivers on the NT platform</title>
		<link>http://blog.assarbad.net/20060727/agnitum_panicked/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Assa&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Export drivers on the NT platform</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 00:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.assarbad.net/20060727/agnitum_panicked/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>[...] So what is the advantage of using export drivers then, you ask? Well, the disadvantage - that it never gets unloaded - is its biggest advantage too. Let us consider kernel patching, the thing about which Agnitum panicked recently and let us consider 32bit systems which still allow for patching. In an article about the Sony rootkit on the Lavasoft blog I have already explained it in great detail, but let me reiterate some things and quote some of my own words: Why the “Sony Rootkit” is badly implemented … [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] So what is the advantage of using export drivers then, you ask? Well, the disadvantage - that it never gets unloaded - is its biggest advantage too. Let us consider kernel patching, the thing about which Agnitum panicked recently and let us consider 32bit systems which still allow for patching. In an article about the Sony rootkit on the Lavasoft blog I have already explained it in great detail, but let me reiterate some things and quote some of my own words: Why the “Sony Rootkit” is badly implemented … [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver</title>
		<link>http://blog.assarbad.net/20060727/agnitum_panicked/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 23:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.assarbad.net/20060727/agnitum_panicked/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Incoming link: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/07/28/ms_kernel_security_controversy/ :mrgreen:

This is so pathetic. These guys don't realize they are already using hacker methods. And now they claim they'll have to use hacker methods in future, too. How pathetic ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incoming link: <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/07/28/ms_kernel_security_controversy/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/07/28/ms_kernel_security_controversy/</a> <img src='http://blog.assarbad.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif' alt=':mrgreen:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>This is so pathetic. These guys don&#8217;t realize they are already using hacker methods. And now they claim they&#8217;ll have to use hacker methods in future, too. How pathetic &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver</title>
		<link>http://blog.assarbad.net/20060727/agnitum_panicked/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.assarbad.net/20060727/agnitum_panicked/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Well, that guy over a black magic code could use trackbacks - the blog-way of linking - as well ;)

But yes, the comment is about what I wanted to express.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that guy over a black magic code could use trackbacks - the blog-way of linking - as well <img src='http://blog.assarbad.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>But yes, the comment is about what I wanted to express.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janne</title>
		<link>http://blog.assarbad.net/20060727/agnitum_panicked/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Janne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 15:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.assarbad.net/20060727/agnitum_panicked/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>I saw that black magic code had a small response... ;) 

http://blackmagiccode.blogspot.com/2006/07/on-development-of-security.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw that black magic code had a small response&#8230; <img src='http://blog.assarbad.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a href="http://blackmagiccode.blogspot.com/2006/07/on-development-of-security.html" rel="nofollow">http://blackmagiccode.blogspot.com/2006/07/on-development-of-security.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
